02.22.22 dclxvi00110001

The following were recorded in a LiveJournal in 2005. I this was four years prior to the second LiveJournal of poetry, and I believe this completes all the LJ content I ever wrote.

The page itself was titled "more on the wry thing" (writing? writhing?) with the subtitle "just another five star warning".

From the page's bio: Self-centered, self-serving, self-motivated, self-analytical, self-denying, self-ish little shit.

Interests: art, asia, comics, design, dj, fashion, gamecube, geisha, japan, korn, music, ninja, nintendo, oakley, painting, percussion, pornography, ps2, role-playing games, samurai, sex, sony, surrealism, techno, tool, turntablism, video games, webcomics, women, xbox

23rd February 2005

12:38am: hello world

I would be sorely disappointed if a greater number of people viewed my literary excretions here than they did on my actual, paid-for web presence.

I mean, I can be Google'd for fuck's sake.

It's like that scene in "The Jerk" when Mavin R. Johnstone figures he's become a somebody because he's listed in the phone book.

After all, "Millions of people read these pages every day!"

Sheah, right.

Nice to meecha. Charmed, I'm sure.

24th February 2005

11:36am: cyber self degredation

So I'm surfing around in here and noticing that quite a few people have rather suggestive photos of themselves (mostly men in mid-grip), and a lot more seem to be looking for "erotically good times".

I've made it my mission in life (or rather, it has been my mission) to save women from having to sell themselves out on webcams.

This is not a solicitation of any kind, nor is it a request for people to stop whatever they do that gives them whatever modicum of pleasure they wish to extract from the dark, cold expanses of the digital delusionscape we have made for ourselves.


It's just that anyone who is grasping in the dark for sexual gratification and spending untold hours with technical difficulties, stuttering webcamera images, and scratchy and intermittent voice transmissions: try going to a museum or art exhibition and picking up a live body.

I think, providing of course that you're the kind of person who possesses the courage to openly speak to another human being in the flesh, you'd be pleasantly surprised to find that there are just as many sexually active people walking the streets as there are taking out their frustrations on the 'net (if not more).

I guess I was blessed by having gone through all this when I was much younger and learned so much more quickly.

Just as a side note, I once joined an internet "dating" service (read: relentless, depressing, desperation chat zone) to see what kind of people were looking for what kind of action.

I entered all my vitals and did a search for some straight sex. Got about 1000 hits, maybe 10 in my area.

I then logged in again, claiming to be a woman, and did the same search. I got 100,000 hits, with about 100 in my area.

10 to one are lousy odds. Imagine being in a room, at a party, in this situation. One woman you know is horny, nine guys who are definitely looking to score, and you.

I'll take the single woman wandering the aisles at the nearest Van Gogh exhibit any time. No competition.

Plus, trust me, she's horny.

There's only one way to find out though...

Current Mood:amused

4th March 2005

5:43pm: this is not a title


Got a guy next to me in the internet cafe rambling on about how the 'net has become this "great externalization of humankind's psyche", so I turn to him and say:

"Bullshit. It's just interactive television. And television is the great externalizer. What we've done with these pathetic models of the human brain is create a paradigm for ourselves where we no longer need to think, despite the glaring inferiority of the devices that now deceive us."

I can tell I lost him somewhere around "paradigm". So I make it simple:

"You can turn off your computer. Can you turn off your brain?"

And he's giving me this look, right? So before he can make some witty riposte about using beer to flip the switch I say:

"Hey, I'm no intellectual giant, but if you're gonna suddenly spout nonsense in public you at least ought to expect a reaction of some kind."

That gets him back to his pointing-and-clicking.

13th March 2005

11:37pm: further dispositioning on my disposition

"We don't like your attitude," they said.

"Well I guess that means you're gonna like this ass-kicking even less," was my reply.

What is freedom?

Is it the ability to choose your own adventure? When I "played" those books back in grade school I always kept my fingers planted between the pages of particularly critical choices. I remember the more complex ones wouldn't lead on that you'd made a wrong move until a few sections and choices further, so you'd have to put a lot of fingers between a lot of pages.

In life there's no putting fingers between pages. There are no save points, no revival potions, no reincarnations or second chances.

None that you can empirically prove, anyways.

So what is freedom?

The ability to choose your own adventure? Fine. So then why is it that so many of us able-bodied and able-minded human beings are choosing lives of servitude and self-denial when we could be living large and in charge of our own destinies? Why do so many of us choose to give ourselves over to other people, nameless corporations, and intangible ethereal holinesses?

Some would argue that organization is the key to advancement of a species. I would not try to counter that argument. I believe that organization is essential to survival of any group of individuals.

Trouble is, the human system on an individual level is self-organizing.

So why the hell do we leave organization of mass-systems in the hands of inefficient and capricious bureaucracies?

Because we are fucking lazy. We are unwilling to fight our inherent laziness enough to self-motivate, self-improve, and self-develop.

Ah but not all is lost, for not all are lost.

I believe the basic human struggle of all living generations of human beings lies in this: the struggle against one's own nature.

We rail and moan for freedom, and I think freedom is but a choice.

It is!

That first choice you made when you turned the first page of this great pick-a-path to glory adventure that we call "modern life": should I make my own decisions? Turn to page 123. Should I leave it up to someone else? Turn to page 86.

This is not a static choice. In fact, this choice is always there, just under the surface of every opportunity to make a decision that presents itself to us, suspected or not, unawares or fully conscious.

We always have the right, by default, to fight and breach the walls that we have allowed "society" to create for us, by simply exercising the incontrovertible right of being to make up our own fucking minds.

Now, your correct response to the preceding is: "You're thirty years old, and you're just figuring this out?" to which I say: "No, I've known this all along, it's only now that I can begin to verbalize it, so fuck you."

Are you with me?

Current Mood:quixotic

21st March 2005

12:01am: wants versuz needs

Well goddamn if Oakley hasn't gone and done it again.

So they're releasing a whole new system of ultra-cool, totally wicked, urban soldier gear. Most of it in black shot through with red. So what?

So what?

Damn if I didn't just lay out a pile for some stuff that has suddenly become last season.

And I lie to myself and say I don't need it.

I don't need it. None of it.

I need it. Who am I kidding.

Must find a way to work 90-hour weeks to pay for my next order...

Current Mood:touched

Home · Previous · Next